Most organizations today are not struggling to identify security issues. They are struggling to resolve them at scale.

By the time exposure management becomes a priority, security teams typically already have multiple discovery tools in place, vulnerability scanners, cloud security solutions, identity tools, and external attack surface monitoring. These tools generate a constant stream of findings. What many organizations lack is a consistent and scalable way to translate those findings into remediation that can be executed across IT, engineering, and operations teams.

This is where security programs often stall. Findings accumulate faster than they can be validated or resolved, ownership is distributed across teams, and risk posture can become outdated as environments change. Even well-understood and high-impact issues may remain open because the path from identification to remediation is fragmented across workflows and systems.

As a result, the maturity of an exposure management program is increasingly defined not by how many issues are discovered, but by how effectively they are resolved. Security leaders must ensure that prioritized risks move efficiently through remediation workflows, that progress is measurable, and that exposure truly decreases as actions are taken.

Exposure management, therefore, cannot remain a reporting exercise. It must function as an operational discipline, connecting discovery, prioritization, validation, and remediation into a continuous cycle of measurable risk reduction. The organizations that derive the greatest value are those that can consistently shorten the distance between identifying exposure and eliminating it.Bottom of Form

Modern exposure management has evolved beyond vulnerability counts and alert volume into a discipline centered on measurable risk reduction. As the market matures, security leaders are increasingly seeking platforms that unify signals across vulnerability management, cloud security, application security, and attack surface monitoring to prioritize what truly impacts risk.

However, even with improved visibility and structured frameworks such as CTEM, many organizations continue to face a critical gap: operational accountability. Teams generate prioritized insights, but translating those insights into coordinated remediation, measurable progress, and executive-level reporting remains challenging.

Recognizing this gap between insight and execution, Qualys re-imagined risk operations as a dedicated operational layer designed to unify exposure visibility, remediation workflows, and measurable outcomes.

This approach led to the development of the Qualys Risk Operations Center (ROC).

Overview

Capabilities

Platform Apps

Risk Operations Center (ROC)

Vulnerability & Configuration Management

Compliance

Asset Management

Risk Remediation

Threat Detection & Response

Cloud Security

Use Cases

Segments

Customers

Resources

Research

Support

Partners

Company